Judge allows Elon Musk to include whistleblower claims in Twitter battle

    Elon Musk has won a victory in his legal battle against Twitter to pull out of his $44bn purchase of the social media company, after a Delaware judge said she would consider recently revealed whistleblower allegations by Twitter’s former security head as part of the case.

    Following a three-hour hearing on Tuesday, Chancellor Kathaleen McCormick of the Delaware Court of Chancery agreed to allow the billionaire Tesla chief to amend his complaint to include claims brought by former executive Pieter Zatko against Twitter.

    Zatko, who was fired by Twitter earlier this year and is represented by Whistleblower Aid, filed a complaint to US authorities in early July alleging that the social media group had misled users and regulators about its lax cyber security practices.

    Since July, Musk has sought to back out of buying Twitter, arguing it has underestimated the number of bots on the platform and misled regulators on the matter, in breach of the merger agreement struck in April. But last week his team asserted that, if true, Zatko’s allegations would constitute fresh grounds to cancel the deal.

    In granting the request, McCormick noted that the bar to revise a complaint was “low”.

    However, she sided with Twitter in keeping the trial date for the week of October 17, instead of granting the deferral to November that Musk had asked for. “I am convinced that even four weeks’ delay would risk further harm to Twitter too great to justify,” she wrote.

    The decision could open Twitter up to fresh scrutiny over its cyber security controls, which have previously come under fire after hackers peddling a crypto scam took over the official accounts of hundreds of public figures and companies in July 2020.

    “We are hopeful that winning the motion to amend takes us one step closer to the truth coming out in that courtroom,” said Musk lawyer Alex Spiro, following the ruling.

    A Twitter spokesperson said: “We look forward to presenting our case in court beginning on October 17 and intend to close the transaction on the price and terms agreed upon with Mr Musk.”

    In a court filing released on Wednesday alongside the decision, Musk alleged that the grievances Zatko first published in the Washington Post in July revealed Twitter’s 2021 annual report to be inaccurate. Musk argues this nullifies the merger contract.

    “Zatko’s complaint reveals extensive misconduct and misrepresentations in Twitter’s 2021 10-K related to Twitter’s compliance with binding FTC orders, mass intellectual property violations and inadequate security systems, among other matters,” Musk’s complaint said.

    Twitter has accused Musk of simply getting cold feet over the deal given the market downturn, and repeatedly using “pretexts” to find a way out of what the company says are his obligations to close the deal.

    During Tuesday’s hearing, lawyers for Twitter said Zatko had raised his concerns over the company’s cyber security practices internally early in 2022 and that these were investigated and “determined to be without merit”.

    They also accused Zatko of later starting to “parrot” Musk’s concerns over the separate issue of bots and spam, despite, they said, this not being the security chief’s area of expertise. This was “very, very strange”, they said.

    Chancellor McCormick ordered Musk to limit his new discovery demands on Twitter. “[D]iscovery can be made through targeted document discovery and minimal additional experts and fact witnesses,” she wrote in her opinion.

    Judge allows Elon Musk to include whistleblower claims in Twitter battle Republished from Source via

    Recent Articles


    Related Stories

    Stay on op - Ge the daily news in your inbox